Will youth be ruled out of farming?

By Heather Koehler  |  27 February 2012

Proposed U.S. Farm Child Labor Laws – Part 1

A lot of conversation has been buzzing in the agriculture community, since the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) put forward for suggested changes to its regulations on child labor in agriculture. The DOL is trying to make youth labor regulations in on-farm and non-farm employment more similar. The department’s goal is to improve safety conditions for youth employed in agriculture.

Local teenagers at their summer job on the Koehler family farm, 2010.

Local teenagers work on the Koehler family farm. Summer, 2010

Of course we all want to provide for the safety of our farm employees, especially youth. But those of us who grew up farming understand that compared to other occupations, farming can be hazardous. So we find ourselves asking the question, “What’s a better way to teach future farmers about those dangers: by alienating them from the dangers, or by showing them how to avoid or work safer around hazards?”

I do believe that work safety continues to improve as we integrate more technology, become more aware of farm safety issues, improve our farm facilities and become better managers. And we need to do our part and continue to improve work safety on our farms.

Instead of more regulations that impose further into our lives, most farmers would prefer continuing the educational programs and farm safety workshops that bring awareness to both adults and youth. Most of all, farmers stand by our ability to work side-by-side with our children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews and young employees, providing real-life instruction (at appropriate ages) on how to responsibly avoid the dangers inherent in our hard-working profession.

As the DOL continues to sift through the comments they have received on the proposed changes, the department may alter some of their original proposals. It also appears that the DOL will again open its revisions to public comment. We need to make our voices heard, so youth can still have a place on the farm. In a society where white-collar careers have become the symbols for success, and hard, dirty work can be looked down upon, we should not discourage today’s youth from trying a job in farming.

What do you think? How can we best provide for the safety of young farm workers, while still encouraging them to farm?

Heather Koehler works on the AdFarm public relations team. She and her brothers grew up working on her family’s eastern Pennsylvania farm, where the talents of young adults have been employed for years.


[A1]Hyperlink: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/whd/WHD20111250.htm

AdFarm calls attention to Canada’s Food Freedom Day

By Heather Koehler  |  22 February 2012

By Wendy Ell - From February 9 to February 12, AdFarm Canada brought messages of food freedom to Canadians encouraging them to thank Canada’s agriculture system for producing affordable, safe, nutritious and high quality food.Canada Food Freedom Day

Canada’s Food Freedom Day marked the calendar date by which the average Canadian had earned enough money to pay their entire year’s grocery bill. This year, that date fell on Sunday, February 12, 2012. This year’s calculations once again showed Canada as exhibiting one of the most affordable food systems of all industrialized countries. “As a comparison, Food Freedom Day in Iceland is in late February, while in Mexico it doesn’t come until early March,” Ontario Federation of Agriculture executive member Keith Currie, an AdFarm client, said in a separate statement.

Approximately 12 per cent of our yearly budgets go toward food. Farmers and supply chain dynamics keep food readily available and at a low cost for the vast majority of Canadians.

“Canadians can take pride in having some of the safest and most affordable food in the world. Farmers work hard to ensure the highest quality food is produced with exemplary food safety, animal welfare and environmental standards,” said Canadian Federation of Agriculture president Ron Bonnett.

Just a couple of generations ago, Canadians spent around 40 per cent of their budgets on food. While this decline in food pricing can be attributed to a few things, we know for sure improvements to food chain dynamics were a big part of that.

AdFarm has seen dramatically improved efficiencies in operations through the years – from technology to producers, processors and retail. It is these chain-wide efficiencies that made Food Freedom Day fall only 43 days into the calendar year. Congratulations to us all!

AdFarm’s Calgary staff went out into the city on February 9, with support from Southern Alberta Institute of Technology’s Culinary School, Sunterra Market, Kingsland Farmers’ Market and Bankers Hall, and through the generosity of Calgarians helped to draw in 430 pounds of food donations for the local food bank.

AdFarm’s Guelph staff sourced fresh food from area farmers on February 10 and drove up to Guelph’s local food bank with 200 pounds  of potatoes, 10 bushels of apples, 6 jugs of maple syrup, 6 jars of honey, 27 pounds of cheese, 40 pounds of ground beef and 42 pounds of sausage. A special thank you to Maple Crisp Orchard, Thornloe Cheese and Wellington Country Marketplace for your exceptional product and participation!

Our nation’s less fortunate don’t have the luxury of choice in their diet. Any program that is able to draw in healthy food for those in need is a success, in my mind’s eye!

In addition to the food pulled in for those in need, there was a good stream of social media activity for Food Freedom Day. AdFarm, the Canadian Federation of Agriculture, and the Ontario Federation of Agriculture worked to navigate discussion on media platforms, Facebook and Twitter leading up to Food Freedom Day. Our collective efforts appear to have paid off as we saw excellent engagement on the issue.

AdFarm will continue to look for opportunities to engage our audiences in discussion about topics that we feel are instrumental in helping to improve upon a healthy North American food model. If you have ideas for programs/areas of discussion, please share.

For more photos from Food Freedom Day visit www.flickr.com/photos/adfarm.

Wendy is the Director of Public Relations, Canada with AdFarm. You can reach Wendy via email at wendy.ell@adfarmonline.com or follow her on Twitter at @wendy_PRLady.

Ag and Politics: Slinging the Dirt

By Sarah Kolell  |  3 February 2012

Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. – John F. Kennedy

U.S. Capitol, where complexity reaches a fever pitch.

U.S. Capitol, where complexity reaches a fever pitch.

I’m not sure if it’s because we Americans are in the throes of an election year or because I’ve spent the last few months immersed in agriculture after a time away from the industry, but it seems lately people I encounter are quick to offer their clear and simplistic opinion of subjects that tend to be, well, pretty complex.

Or maybe it’s because we have Facebook and Twitter now, so I know the opinions of more people on more subjects than I ever would have imagined possible a few years ago.

Either way, it seems that some of the most heated debates in politics and agriculture have one thing in common: too many people think there exists a simple “right or wrong” answer.  Rarely are issues of consequence easy to decide. Rarely is an opinion completely black or white.  Can informed, well-meaning people have differing opinions? And not constantly be at one anothers’ throats?

It’s My Way or the Highway

There are certain topics that really seem to galvanize public opinion. In politics in 2011, credit ratings for US treasury bonds were downgraded for the first time in history. The debt ceiling crisis put a microscope on the inability of the two political parties to work together for the good of the nation. Turns out, nothing is more important than party loyalty. Politicians, pundits and regular Joes/Janes all seem to reduce the complex issues into black and white: my way, or no way.

If trying to get a handle on crazy, out-of-control debt and not falling, as a country, into sovereign default isn’t something our elected officials can reach an agreement on, is there anything they’ll put aside special interest-loyalties to accomplish? Can a complex, but correct solution be reached? Nothing about reaching that solution is simple.

The Way I Farm Is Better Than The Way You Farm

In agriculture, some of the galvanizing topics that tend to get tunnel vision treatment are the perceived superiority of organically produced food, and concerns over livestock production. But nothing takes off the blinders more quickly than going right to the source, and learning what’s really involved.

View of Climax, MN from my family’s farm.

View of Climax, MN from my family’s farm.

During a recent blogger tour for KnowACaliforniaFarmer.com, the group visited a Naturipe strawberry field, where the farm manager visited with bloggers about how organic strawberries are grown and compared that to how conventional strawberries are grown; he grows both. Turns out, both require pesticides (bugs eat strawberries) and both require fertilization. Whether pesticides are made from synthetic or naturally-occurring ingredients, and whether fertilizer is urea or fish meal-based, the takeaway wasn’t a decisive organic or conventional is better than the other.It’s not that simple. Farming is complicated.

Our group of bloggers noted that every question they raised about how conventional produce is grown and every question they raised about how organic produce is grown had intricate answers.  At the end of the tour, I believe that one important takeaway was that farmers need to produce enough food to feed the people who need to eat and no element of how they do that is simple.

The Long and Short

Just like most issues in an election can’t be easily categorized, most aspects of farming are also complex. And that’s OK. Rarely are issues of consequence easy to decide.

It’s easy to become self-protective when you’re deeply involved in an issue. It’s harder to back up and help others understand as many of the elements of a complex issue as are needed to begin creating an informed opinion.

How do you form opinions on complex subjects that are important to you and your family? Do your opinions evolve?  Is it possible, through debate to change your position on an issue?

Sarah is AdFarm’s Director of Public Relations in the U.S. and, her co-workers can attest, talks politics way too much. She tweets about ag, politics and parenting @skprkc.

Canaryseed for human consumption – who knew?

By admin  |  16 December 2011

By Wendy Ell - 

CanaryseedOn December 6-7 in Lethbridge, Alberta farmers, researchers, consultants and ag specialists came together at the Farming Smarter Conference to discuss new market opportunities, branding, industry trends, research findings, innovative practices and on-farm management.

Farming Smarter is the newly formed association and amalgamation of efforts between the Southern Alberta Conservation Association (SACA) and the Southern Applied Research Association (SARA). The new association has committed to continuing on with fall ag conferences in the Alberta areas of Lethbridge and Medicine Hat. The organization plans to soon launch a new website, rich with resource materials and industry information. Their current website outlines their key directives and projects. Look for their new site, set to launch in January of 2012.

This year’s conference discussions included such things as: 2012 grain opportunities and challenges, new commodity markets to watch, recycling on the farm, how best to manage community diseases like the wheat streak mosaic virus and stripe rust (expected to hit Alberta in the spring), good stewardship practices and neighborly actions, the hydrologic response that is showing up from wetlands drainage in Canada, whether the abolition of the Canadian Wheat Board structure will truly bring marketing freedom, and how to use the various social media platforms to your advantage to better build your business. A lot of great discussion!!

Kevin Hursh, writer and ag consultant extraordinaire from Saskatchewan provided a nice statistical look at Canadian Agriculture and did a great job of identifying future opportunities for Alberta area farmers in the audience. He asked guests to take a close look at lentils, biodiesel grains like mustard and to start following along in the R&D process of canaryseed. Programs are currently in process to work with the canaryseed so that it can be made available for human consumption – and moreover, offer a healthy profile to consumers. Those looking for another gluten-free option might want to keep this on their radar. Possible canaryseed uses are sesame seed replacement, specialty starch, and vermicelli noodles.

Tom Droog, a passionate story-teller, gave guests a glimpse into the hurdles and hoops he encountered through the years as he developed his Spitz business into an empire worthy of purchase by one of North America’s most admired snack-food companies, PepsiCo.

Shaun Haney and Gary Chambers, social media participants with media/blog sites http://www.realagriculture.com/ and http://www.tractorview.com/ did a stand-up job of introducing and outlining the primary tools of social media to conference guests. I liked how they started off their presentation outlining the key differences between social media use/adoption (among the ag community) in Canada and the U.S. They explained how the platforms are being used for both animal and environmental activism as well as less intense information sharing about “what is happening on the farm” (marketing, issues, management practices, story sharing). It is successful social media users like Shaun and Gary (and AdFarm, for that matter) that help to shape the online ag discussion in a constructive, rewarding fashion. For those of you on Twitter, you may want to check out hashtag #Agchat, a weekly conversation for folks involved in the business of growing food, fuel, feed and fiber. Discussions take place every Tuesday, 8-10pm ET.

Thanks to Ken Coles and his team at Farming Smarter for a great conference. I look forward to the opportunity of listening in on the discussions again next year!

 

Wendy is the Director of Public Relations with AdFarm. You can reach Wendy via email at wendy.ell@adfarmonline.com or follow her on Twitter at @wendy_PRLady.

U.S. Subsidies — The Elephant on the Farm

By admin  |  6 December 2011

Americans say it’s time to tighten our spending belts – surely they won’t include agriculture!?

corn_with_dollarsBy Brandon Souza – It’s hard to avoid the discussion of money in America these days. Taxes, government spending, fraud, corporate greed, cost of living, 99% vs 1%  – so among all the conversations, do you think anyone will bring up the idea of cutting farm subsidies? After all, we’re talking $20 billion dollars this year, not exactly chump change.  Yes, farm subsidies are a sensitive subject. But hardly a new one.

Help for Agriculture in a Slow Time

Starting in the 1920s and 30s, a series of government acts were passed to offset the ravages of a failing economy and the Great Depression – sound familiar? The 1922 Grain Futures Act, the 1929 Agricultural Marketing Act and the 1933 Agricultural Adjustment Act all came to be at a time when approximately 25% of the country’s population resided on farms and many Americans felt that agriculture couldn’t afford to fail.  So the government stepped in to help.

The years progressed and while farms became more efficient and consolidated, agricultural residency shrunk to the current 2% of the total US population. But the subsidies didn’t shrink.  They now equate to an annual assistance program that costs the U.S. government (us) tens of billions of dollars annually. One might think that given agriculture’s incredible technical advances we could at least talk about change. But that kind of talk meets with resistance.

Please Spend Less, But Not on the Farm

Today, most (though not all) farmers and agribusinesses are big proponents of less government intervention, often doling out scathing opinions on the wasteful spending that takes place in Washington. Ironically, they’re also among the first to defend crop subsidies. $500,000 of federal funds to build a park on the side of the interstate?  Heck, no. $500,000 to make up the difference on their balance sheet? Heck, yes.

Like many dependencies, this one won’t end quickly or simply.

Economic Viability and National Security

Proponents argue that crop subsidies are vital to the ongoing success of the agricultural industry in America and the security of our food supply. True, but only in part. More than 90% of crop subsidy money goes specifically to corn, wheat, soybeans and rice. Hundreds of other crops receive little to no support. They are at the mercy of the free market, yet they thrive – proof, perhaps, that agriculture can exist without government funding.  But do we have the ability to wean off assistance without shocking the market so badly that farmers take a devastating hit?

It’s Time for Policy Change

Today, the merits of government support are at a crossroads of irrelevance – agriculture is part of a new economic age and an economy that will not bounce back anytime soon. Understand that and you understand that agriculture subsidies are not immune to nationwide debate.

Some organizations, such as the National Corn Growers Association, have stepped up to the plate to provide ideas that will replace existing functions like the Average Crop Revenue Election Program. Kudos to the NCGA – because even if there are some disagreements on their proposal, at least they’re moving the conversation forward.

What’s next? With the recent failure of Washington’s Super Committee, ag spending faces a $15 billion cut over the next nine years as part of deficit reductions.

In 2012, let’s all work to move the discussion on farm subsidies towards viable, amicable solutions – devoid of finger pointing and special exemptions. The problem isn’t going away. We need real solutions to help solve it.

 

Brandon Souza is an Account Executive in AdFarm’s Sacramento, CA office. Follow him on Twitter: @btsouza