Posts Tagged ‘Food Production’

Who makes the call on animal welfare?

By Tyler Kelley, June 28, 2012

Consequences abound in coming changes to animal housing regulations.

Once upon a time producers, veterinarians and other experts shaped production practices for animal agriculture. Today, sadly, activist groups like the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) force their way into executive board rooms of food companies, the halls of Congress and offices of state capitols to drive agendas that have consequences far beyond the farm.

For proof we need look no further than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, the latest chain to require their pork supplies to come from farmers who don’t use gestation stalls to house pregnant sows. It is worthwhile to note that Domino’s Pizza stands alone in rejecting the HSUS resolution to study eliminating gestation stalls. Domino’s chooses to trust that the experts and their proven, science-based practices to know best how to raise their animals.

Is Group Housing Better?

The HSUS demand for the elimination of gestation stalls has come despite the lack of scientific proof that group housing of sows improves animal welfare.

Thanks to the National Pork Board for this photo.

Thanks to the National Pork Board for this photo.

In fact, evaluations by scientists at Texas Tech University,  researchers at the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and in Australia show the welfare of sows in gestation stalls — which are still the majority of sows — is equal to that of those raised in group pens. Pork producers use gestation stalls to keep aggressive “bully” sows from fighting or stealing food from more docile animals, as this Missouri pork producer explains.

Change At What Cost?

While it seems the sows’ welfare isn’t affected, the elimination of stalls will have a big impact on pork producers. Dr. Paul Sundberg, the National Pork Board’s vice president of science and technology, has said that these changes could cost the average pork producer millions of dollars.

And that’s the real issue: when biased or misinformed groups force a scientifically questionable agenda it can add millions of dollars in costs and drive some producers out of business. The result could be a decrease in pork supplies and an increase in the price of pork products to consumers.

When the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization shows that demand for food and fiber will nearly double by 2050, ill-informed regulations make little sense. Shouldn’t we encourage hard-working farmers and ranchers of the world to use every technology and production practice possible to meet the food and fiber needs of the growing world?

Tyler Kelley comes from a Northwest Missouri hog and cattle farm and now works as an AdFarm PR specialist in Kansas City.

Keeping the Conversation Straight

By Heather Koehler, March 13, 2012

Proposed Farm Child Labor Laws – Part 2

The agricultural community has been engaged in discussions about proposed changes that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has put forward for the regulations governing youth labor in agriculture. While discussion is a good thing, the conversations have in some cases included speculation, and in other cases missed important points entirely.

Partially True Point #1: “My kids won’t be able to help with farm chores that help shape our values, such as a hard work ethic.” This argument is brought forward in opposition to the proposed changes. It is somewhat true and also somewhat false.

A long, hot summer on the Koehler farm.

A long, hot summer on the Koehler farm.

The truth is that after receiving a strong response from the farming community, the DOL says it has changed its stance on the “parental exemption.” This exemption states that farm owners or operators’ children of any age will still be able to perform any activity otherwise prohibited to workers deemed too young. This exemption is supposed to include a farm organized as a corporation or partnership, as long as the parent has a “substantial interest” in the farm.

The term “substantial interest” remains vague. The farm community will have to monitor how the DOL defines it. Another unknown is whether grandchildren could work on their grandparents’ farms or nieces and nephews on uncles’ or aunts’ farms.

There should be another opportunity for public comment on the parental exemption in a revised DOL proposal, due out in early summer.

Partially True Point #2: “FFA and 4H livestock programs will be outlawed.” This concern is mostly false. The proposed rules apply to farm employees. FFA and 4H students would not be affected if they are performing animal husbandry on volunteer time, i.e., as long as they are not paid for their time working on FFA or 4H projects.

For FFA and 4H students who are interested in animal husbandry and who do not have farming parents, the proposed changes make high-school jobs like caring for livestock very difficult. Anyone younger than 16 years old would not be allowed to be paid for:

  • branding, breeding, castrating, dehorning, vaccinating, or treating sick or injured animals;
  • working in a yard, pen or stall with an in-tact stallion, boar or bull older than 6 months of age, a sow with suckling pigs, or a cow with a newborn calf;
  • catching or cooping poultry;
  • or herding animals on horseback, using motorized vehicles including ATVs, or in confined spaces such as feedlots or corrals (so basically any herding).

Remember, farmers’ children will be exempt from these rules. But those grandkids, nieces, nephews and children of parents who own a “less than substantial interest” in a farm corporation or partnership are still TBD.

Missing Point of Discussion: The proposed changes will reduce the maximum height at which hired farm workers under age 16 may work. It reduces the maximum height from the current standard of 20 feet to just 6 feet. This would include work on structures, ladders, vehicles, machines and implements.  So no more working in a haymow or stacking hay on a wagon or climbing to the top of a newer model combine or sitting on top of a detasseler carrier. This rule change could eliminate a large number of summer jobs for high-school kids in rural areas.

The farming community needs to keep focused on the DOL’s proposed rule changes. They could alter the way in which many children grow up in rural America, developing their love and respect for farming. Stay updated by viewing the Department of Labor website dedicated to the subject.

What other proposed changes do you think the farming community should question?

Heather Koehler works on the AdFarm public relations team. She and her brothers grew up working on her family’s eastern Pennsylvania farm that has employed the talents of young adults for years.

Free to Be [Fill in the Blank]

By Sarah Kolell, March 8, 2012

After breakfast this morning, I spent time doing a few of the things I love. Played with my toddler, did some writing and then headed into work. The morning was full of things needing my attention, though I didn’t need to worry about the hens that laid the eggs in my morning scramble. Or growing the peanuts that topped my toast, or whether or not a freeze would ruin the orange crop and limit my juice.

America’s farmers were on top of those things, freeing me up to do my thing.

In the course of history, it’s pretty recently that farmers have increased production to a point that frees up the other  97.5 percent of the population for their respective pursuits. Here are a few fun facts:

  • The United States is one of the most advanced countries in the world because fewer farmers have continued to produce more and more food for the rest of society.
  • In 1790, farmers accounted for 90% of the U.S. labor force.
  • Today only 2.5% of the U.S. population produces enough food for everyone else in the country.
  • Due to improved farming techniques, modern machinery, and technology, today’s farmer on average produces enough food for 155 people.

March 8th is National Ag Day. The official theme for the day is Agriculture: Affordable, Abundant, Amazing. In recognition of this theme, the talented folks at AdFarm have contributed to a video featuring the reflections of people who don’t work in agriculture but who, as a result of the contribution made by farmers, are free to do more with their lives.

You can watch our video here.

We at AdFarm, and myself personally, are privileged to work with and on behalf of, farmers around the world. Farming isn’t just a job. It’s a lifestyle. The commitment is huge and we are grateful for the work of farmers who feed our rapidly-growing world.

Thanks, farmers.

Sarah is a Minnesota farm kid turned communicator and AdFarm’s Director of Public Relations in the U.S. She tweets about ag, politics and parenting @skprkc

Ag and Politics: Slinging the Dirt

By Sarah Kolell, February 3, 2012

Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. – John F. Kennedy

U.S. Capitol, where complexity reaches a fever pitch.

U.S. Capitol, where complexity reaches a fever pitch.

I’m not sure if it’s because we Americans are in the throes of an election year or because I’ve spent the last few months immersed in agriculture after a time away from the industry, but it seems lately people I encounter are quick to offer their clear and simplistic opinion of subjects that tend to be, well, pretty complex.

Or maybe it’s because we have Facebook and Twitter now, so I know the opinions of more people on more subjects than I ever would have imagined possible a few years ago.

Either way, it seems that some of the most heated debates in politics and agriculture have one thing in common: too many people think there exists a simple “right or wrong” answer.  Rarely are issues of consequence easy to decide. Rarely is an opinion completely black or white.  Can informed, well-meaning people have differing opinions? And not constantly be at one anothers’ throats?

It’s My Way or the Highway

There are certain topics that really seem to galvanize public opinion. In politics in 2011, credit ratings for US treasury bonds were downgraded for the first time in history. The debt ceiling crisis put a microscope on the inability of the two political parties to work together for the good of the nation. Turns out, nothing is more important than party loyalty. Politicians, pundits and regular Joes/Janes all seem to reduce the complex issues into black and white: my way, or no way.

If trying to get a handle on crazy, out-of-control debt and not falling, as a country, into sovereign default isn’t something our elected officials can reach an agreement on, is there anything they’ll put aside special interest-loyalties to accomplish? Can a complex, but correct solution be reached? Nothing about reaching that solution is simple.

The Way I Farm Is Better Than The Way You Farm

In agriculture, some of the galvanizing topics that tend to get tunnel vision treatment are the perceived superiority of organically produced food, and concerns over livestock production. But nothing takes off the blinders more quickly than going right to the source, and learning what’s really involved.

View of Climax, MN from my family’s farm.

View of Climax, MN from my family’s farm.

During a recent blogger tour for KnowACaliforniaFarmer.com, the group visited a Naturipe strawberry field, where the farm manager visited with bloggers about how organic strawberries are grown and compared that to how conventional strawberries are grown; he grows both. Turns out, both require pesticides (bugs eat strawberries) and both require fertilization. Whether pesticides are made from synthetic or naturally-occurring ingredients, and whether fertilizer is urea or fish meal-based, the takeaway wasn’t a decisive organic or conventional is better than the other.It’s not that simple. Farming is complicated.

Our group of bloggers noted that every question they raised about how conventional produce is grown and every question they raised about how organic produce is grown had intricate answers.  At the end of the tour, I believe that one important takeaway was that farmers need to produce enough food to feed the people who need to eat and no element of how they do that is simple.

The Long and Short

Just like most issues in an election can’t be easily categorized, most aspects of farming are also complex. And that’s OK. Rarely are issues of consequence easy to decide.

It’s easy to become self-protective when you’re deeply involved in an issue. It’s harder to back up and help others understand as many of the elements of a complex issue as are needed to begin creating an informed opinion.

How do you form opinions on complex subjects that are important to you and your family? Do your opinions evolve?  Is it possible, through debate to change your position on an issue?

Sarah is AdFarm’s Director of Public Relations in the U.S. and, her co-workers can attest, talks politics way too much. She tweets about ag, politics and parenting @skprkc.

What is the impact of going “Back To The Start” for modern agriculture?

By Les Kahl, September 12, 2011

Recently I saw a blog post featuring a new animated video from US based restaurant, Chipotle (NYSE:CMG). Watch the video on the blog I found it on here.

JS West's egg laying chickens in an enriched colony barn

JS West's egg laying chickens in an enriched colony barn

Bottom line is modern agriculture is doing everything it can possibly do to keep up with and plan for the demand for food, not only in the US but in the world at large. It’s been well documented that the world population is growing at an alarming rate – there are plenty of facts and figures out there – none of which I will bore you with here. But, if we go back to the start a lot of people will go hungry.

Les Kahl, senior AdFarm partner, in a modern hog barn.

Les Kahl, senior AdFarm partner, in a modern hog barn.

Through my work at AdFarm, I’ve been fortunate enough to meet many family farmers and producers who utilize modern farming practices. I can tell you they all care about the land they work and deeply care for the animals they raise. I’ve been in modern hog barns where the producers interact with the animals like they are a part of their family. The operations are family farms that have been in the family for generations. Their parents, grandparents and great-grandparents farmed the land they farm today. They know the stories of what it was like back at the start. Even with that first hand knowledge these farmers and producers know the way they produce food now is both safe and humane. They also know it’s absolutely necessary to feed a growing population.

You don’t have to look very far to find someone trying to tell us that modern agricultural practices are less than what they should be. Some of that is because agriculture has been standing back letting someone else tell it’s story. If more people knew both sides of the story I’m sure they’d still be moved emotionally by the Chipotle video but the emotion might be based more in fear.

Maybe modern agriculture needs a better sound track. What song would you use to help tell the story of today’s agriculture?

Les Kahl is a senior partner and creative director at AdFarm who works with clients and brands across North America, residing in Kansas City with his wife and two young children. Follow him on Twitter @les14 .